Palm vein readers are at the forefront of biometric authentication due to their high security and accuracy. When it comes to USB palm vein readers, two brands stand out: Fujitsu and X-Telcom. While both offer advanced palm vein technology, X-Telcom brings added value through unique features like end-to-end software support, free license for up to 10,000 palm vein IDs, and free matching algorithms for both local and cloud databases. In this blog, we’ll take a deep dive into how these two devices compare.
1.Identification Method and Speed
Both Fujitsu and X-Telcom rely on palm prints and vein recognition to ensure high security.
- Fujitsu: 1.2 seconds recognition speed.
- X-Telcom: 0.35 seconds Palm Vein Recognition speed in 5M+ User IDs database.
While both devices are highly efficient, X-Telcom takes the lead in terms of recognition speed, which can be important in high-traffic environments.
2. Data Encryption and Security
Security is a top concern for any biometric system.
- Fujitsu: Does not mention specific encryption methods.
- X-Telcom: Offers a standard encryption method via server software, with the option of an additional hardware security chipset (at extra cost). This provides more control over data security.
X-Telcom’s encryption options, especially the hardware chipset, make it a more secure choice for organizations with sensitive data needs.
3. End-to-End Software Support
One standout feature of X-Telcom is its end-to-end software support. This ensures a seamless integration of both the hardware and software components, providing a more efficient and streamlined user experience.
- Fujitsu: Does not offer specific details on end-to-end software support.
- X-Telcom: Provides full end-to-end software support, which includes integration with both local and cloud databases, enhancing flexibility and ease of use.
X-Telcom’s software solution is comprehensive, providing both local and cloud database compatibility, and streamlining the entire process from registration to authentication.
4. Mobile Integration
- Fujitsu: Does not support mobile phone integration for palm vein ID registration.
- X-Telcom: Allows mobile phone integration for palm vein ID registration, offering greater flexibility for users.
This mobile integration is a big plus for businesses looking to register palm vein IDs on-the-go or in decentralized environments.
5. User Capacity and Free License
X-Telcom also provides significant value with its license structure. It offers free licenses for up to 10,000 palm vein IDs, which is ideal for small to medium-sized deployments.
- Fujitsu: The number of supported user IDs is unspecified.
- X-Telcom: Supports up to 10,000 IDs locally without extra cost. After that, additional charges apply.
This free license for up to 10,000 users is a major advantage for businesses looking to scale without incurring significant extra costs.
6. Recognition Accuracy
Accuracy is critical in biometric systems to reduce the chance of false positives or false negatives.
- Fujitsu: Offers recognition accuracy of “one in a million.”
- X-Telcom: Also boasts “one in a million” accuracy.
Both brands offer exceptional accuracy, making them reliable for high-security applications.
7. Environmental Adaptability
Both Fujitsu and X-Telcom are built to operate in varying lighting conditions, ensuring consistent performance in different environments.
- Fujitsu: Can operate in lighting conditions ranging from 1 to 80,000 LUX.
- X-Telcom: Also works in lighting conditions ranging from 1 to 80,000 LUX.
Both devices excel in challenging environments with fluctuating light levels, making them suitable for both indoor and outdoor use.
8. Certification and Lifespan
- Fujitsu: Has an 8-year lifespan but lacks certifications for financial applications.
- X-Telcom: Features a 10-year lifespan and can pass PCI financial security certification, making it ideal for financial applications such as payments.
The added certification for PCI compliance makes X-Telcom a better fit for businesses in the financial sector or those requiring high security for transactions.
9. Application Scenarios
- Fujitsu: Primarily used in access control systems and payment applications like Amazon Pay.
- X-Telcom: Supports a wider range of applications, including financial payments, security access control, and more, making it highly versatile.
X-Telcom’s broader range of supported applications makes it the better option for businesses that require both secure access and payment capabilities.
10. Commercial Product Shipments and Pricing
- Fujitsu: 200,000 units shipped, priced between $299 and $350.
- X-Telcom: 240,000 units shipped, priced between $199 and $225.
X-Telcom offers a more affordable option, especially for larger-scale deployments, without sacrificing functionality or security.
Palm Vein Modules: IR vs. RGB+IR ( Unlocking Security: Why RGB+IR Palm Vein Modules Are Essential for Payment Systems)
A significant distinction between Fujitsu and X-Telcom’s palm vein readers is the type of imaging technology used. Fujitsu’s palm vein module supports only IR (infrared) imaging, which can be limiting in certain high-security scenarios, especially in payment environments. The lack of RGB (color) support in Fujitsu’s module means it cannot compare palm print and vein patterns simultaneously, a crucial feature for ensuring the highest level of security in payment applications.
David, a hardware engineer from X-Telcom with over a decade of experience working on WeChat Payment platform integration, explained that this limitation is a critical flaw in Fujitsu’s module. According to David, current palm vein-based payment systems require a dual-camera approach—RGB and IR. The RGB camera captures the palm print, while the IR camera detects the palm vein pattern. The system then compares the two to ensure they match, offering the highest possible accuracy and security.
This dual-camera setup allows payment systems to reach a false acceptance rate as low as 1e-6, even with large databases. X-Telcom’s Palm Vein Reader supports this RGB+IR dual-camera configuration, which is essential for ensuring both the palm print and the palm vein pattern are checked simultaneously for greater security.
Conclusion
Both Fujitsu and X-Telcom offer high-quality USB palm vein readers, but X-Telcom stands out due to several key advantages. Not only does it offer end-to-end software support and mobile integration, but it also provides a free license for up to 10,000 palm vein IDs and free matching algorithms for both local and cloud databases. These features make X-Telcom a more scalable, flexible, and cost-effective choice, especially for businesses that require large deployments or seamless integration with cloud solutions.
For businesses that prioritize cost-effectiveness, scalability, and advanced features, X-Telcom is the clear winner. Its dual-camera RGB+IR configuration makes it the best fit for payment scenarios, where high security and accurate matching are non-negotiable. If want to know more, Pls contact X-Telcom Palm Vein Reader Manufacturer here.
